Court rules El-Rufai has case to answer in phone-tapping trial

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a no-case submission filed by former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai in his trial over the alleged unlawful interception of the telephone communications of National Security Adviser (NSA) Nuhu Ribadu.

Judge Joyce Abdulmalik, in a ruling on Monday, held that the State Security Service (SSS) had presented sufficient evidence to require Mr El-Rufai to enter his defence, if he chooses.

The judge consequently ordered the former governor, the sole defendant in the case, to enter his defence.

A defendant who fails to enter defence risks may leave the judge with no other option than to foreclose the defence and determine the defendant’s guilty or innocence soley on the strenght of the evidence presented by the prosecution.

Mr El-Rufai, through his lawyer, Akinyemi Aremu, had urged the court to hold that the prosecution had failed to establish a case requiring him to defend himself.

However, the SSS lawyer, Oluwole Aladedoye, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), opposed the submission and adopted the prosecution’s arguments against it.

Mr Aladedoye argued that the defence had failed to address Exhibit B, which the prosecution said contained Mr El-Rufai’s alleged admission concerning the interception of Mr Ribadu’s telephone communications.

Mr El-Rufai, who has been in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC), maintained that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the former governor and that he was therefore required to enter his defence.

Backstory

The SSS filed the charges against Mr El-Rufai following comments he made during an interview on Arise Television in the aftermath of a failed attempt to arrest him at the Abuja airport in February.

PREMIUM TIMES reported that SSS operatives attempted to arrest Mr El-Rufai on 12 February, following his arrival from Cairo, Egypt.

While the arrest was unsuccessful, the security operatives seized the former governor’s passport.

The following day, Mr El-Rufai alleged during a live interview on ‘Prime Time’, an Arise Television programme, that Mr Ribadu was behind the alleged attempt to arrest him at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

He said he knew Mr Ribadu ordered his arrest from listening to a wire-tapped phone call made by Mr Ribadu instructing security operatives to carry out his arrest.

Charges and trial

Following the interview, the SSS charged him with five counts relating to the alleged unlawful interception of telephone communications and other offences under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Amendment Act 2024 and the Nigerian Communications Act 2003.

Mr El-Rufai pleaded not guilty to the charges when he was arraigned in April.

The prosecution called two witnesses before closing its case in June.

The first witness, an SSS operative identified in court by the code name APC, testified about the agency’s monitoring and preservation of the recording of Mr El-Rufai’s television interview.

The prosecution also called lawyer and human rights activist Deji Adeyanju, who testified about the interview.

Mr Adeyanju told the court that he was at the Arise Television studio in Abuja when Mr El-Rufai gave the interview. The court also watched a recording of the programme.

During his testimony, Mr Adeyanju confirmed that the recording reflected what he witnessed during the interview.

Under cross-examination, he told the court that he heard Mr El-Rufai say, “we listened to their calls”.

However, he acknowledged that Mr El-Rufai did not expressly say that he had personally tapped the NSA’s telephone.

After presenting the witnesses and its evidence, the prosecution informed the court that it would not call any further witnesses and closed its case.

El-Rufai’s no-case submission

Following the prosecution’s closure of its case, the defence indicated that it would file a no-case submission, asking the court to dismiss the charges without requiring Mr El-Rufai to enter his defence.

A no-case submission asks a court to discharge a defendant on the ground that the prosecution has not presented sufficient evidence to warrant a defence.

Mr El-Rufai subsequently filed the submission, arguing that the prosecution had failed to establish a case against him.

The prosecution, however, opposed the application, insisting that its evidence was sufficient to require him to answer the allegations.

‘There’s a case to answer’

In Monday’s ruling, Judge Abdulmalik agreed with the prosecution that Mr El-Rufai has a case to answer.

He rejected the defence’s argument and held that the evidence presented was sufficient to require Mr El-Rufai to enter his defence.

This means the former governor will now have to enter his defence if he chooses to contest the allegations.

Mr El-Rufai is facing corruption charges instituted against him by the ICPC before two separate courts in Kaduna over his activities during his eight years as governor. He is also pursuing different human rights enforcement cases which arose from the actions of the ICPC concerning him and his family members since his detention by the commission in February. He recently lost two of the cases. (Premium Times)