Ogun State government, on Thursday, faulted the judicial process that led to the provisional attachment of three presidential jets in France by the Judicial Court of Paris on 7th March and 2nd August 2024.
The seized presidential jets are a Dassault Falcon 7X, a Boeing 737, and a newly purchased Airbus A330.
The Dassault Falcon 7X was at Le Bourget airport in Paris, while the Boeing 737, and an Airbus 330 were at Basel-Mulhouse airport in Switzerland. They were all undergoing maintenance.
The case
Recall that a Chinese company, Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd, had sought several orders from the court over an aborted underlying contract between the company and Ogun State government, which was initiated in 2007.
In a statement signed by the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Strategy, Kayode Akinmade, the Ogun State government described the latest development as the new antics by the Chinese company to appropriate Nigerian assets in foreign jurisdictions.
The statement described the whole legal process as nothing, but a total charade with fraudulent notion.
The government added that the company deliberately concealed the litigation from both the Nigerian government and Ogun State, as well as their legal counsel before hurriedly securing orders of seizure.
It added that the company must have misled the Judicial Court of Paris to the use and nature of the assets it sought to attach and not made full disclosure to the court as required by law.
Resolution
According to the statement, Ogun State, together with the Federal Government, had already taken immediate action to ensure that those provisional attachments were lifted quickly.
They accuse the company of reneging on the earlier discussion for an amicable resolution of the case.
It likened the case to that of P&ID, describing it as a very unfortunate case of unscrupulous individuals masquerading as foreign investors with the sole aim of defrauding Ogun State and Nigeria at large.
The statement reads, “On August 14, 2024, the attention of the Ogun State Government was drawn to the provisional attachment of three Nigerian government-owned aircraft in France by the Chinese company, Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd. (Zhongshan).
“Ogun State also learned of two orders of the Judicial Court of Paris dated 7 March 2024 and 12 August 2024 respectively, both obtained by Zhongshan without notice being duly given to the Federal Government or Nigeria, Ogun State or their legal counsel.
“This is the latest in a series of ill-advised attempts by Zhongshan to attach Nigerian-owned assets in foreign jurisdictions, none of which have to date led to the recovery of any sums from Nigeria.
… sovereign property
“Each of the three aircraft is used solely for sovereign purposes and as such are immune from attachment under international and French laws. In obtaining the provisional attachments, Zhongshan deliberately withheld information from the Federal Government of Nigeria, Ogun State and their legal counsel.
“Just like the P&ID case, this is another unfortunate case of unscrupulous individuals masquerading as foreign investors with the sole aim of defrauding Ogun State and Nigeria.
“It should be recalled that the underlying contract between Ogun State and Zhongshan was executed in 2007, 12 years before the present administration, for the management of a free-trade zone.
“The parties entered into a dispute in 2015 with arbitration commencing in 2016.
$60m compensation
“By 2019, when the current State Administration took office, the hearing at the arbitration had been all but concluded.
“The Arbitral Panel awarded over 60 million USD against the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) which was a co-defendant, when all Zhongshan had done was to build a perimeter fence around the free-trade zone. Needless to say this was a bad/unfair decision.
“The present State Administration could not in all good conscience allow such an unconscionable and baseless decision, which would dissipate the commonwealth of the good people of Ogun State.
“Accordingly, and based on erudite legal advice, this Administration resolved to resist the enforcement of the award. The resistance was successful in eight different jurisdictions.
“Currently, there are pending appeals against recognition orders issued in both the US and UK,” the statement read. (Vanguard)
