The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), has appealed to the National Assembly (NASS) to enact a law that would criminalise indecent dressing.
This was contained in a statement released to newsmen on Thursday 6th October, 2022 by the director of MURIC, Professor Ishaq Akintola.
The statement reads :
“In a video which went viral recently, an okada passenger was seen giving one stroke of the cane each to two indecently dressed women on the street. There was nothing the women who received the punishment could have done because the okada was in motion. In fact, one of the two women rolled on the floor, writhing in pain while her traducer yelled at her, ‘Go and dress well! Idiot, ashewo. Uwaaka!’ .
“While we do not endorse the action of the okada passenger as it is capable of enthroning anarchy, we affirm clearly, unambiguously and unequivocally that this singular action is a wakeup call. It has opened our eyes to the fact that appearing half nude in public has electrifying effect on the opposite sex and that something must be done about it.
“Different methods have been adopted in different Nigerian environments to discourage indecent dressing. For example, the hisbah (Shariah police) is always there in places like Kano and Sokoto to check indecent dressing. In some Igbo communities, market women will surround any woman who dares to come out half naked to the market. There will be shouts of ‘Ashawo come market!’ and the women will open sachets of pure water to spray on her body.
“The most recent and most outstanding example of the rejection of indecent dressing in Iboland is the ban imposed on the use of mini-skirts by school girls in Anambra State by Governor Charles Soludo on Monday, 19th September, 2022 (https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/09/anambra-bans-use-of-miniskirts-as-school-uniform-2/).
“Several Nigerian tertiary institutions have also rolled out dressing codes in a bid to outlaw indecent dressing. The Buhari/Idiagbon regime (1983 – 85) had also introduced War Against Indiscipline with indecent dressing among women as a cardinal area of attention. The move succeeded in injecting a strong dose of discipline at the time but enemies of morality truncated the administration and the succeeding regime of Babangida turned back the hands of the clock.
“MURIC rejects the one-sided view on sexual harassment. Most women who dress half nude in public boast of ‘dressing to kill’. But who are the victims of this ‘attempted manslaughter’? It is men. We submit that indecent dressing by women tantamounts to sexual harassment on the part of the descendants of Hawa (Eve).
Continuing on why the legislators should criminalise indecent dressing, MURIC said:
“Therefore, there should be no preferential treatment for women on the issue of sexual harassment. Women are as guilty as men if not more. Rape is on the increase in society today because moral bankruptcy is at its peak. Women are now anxious to expose provocative parts of their anatomy in public. That is seduction. We are of the opinion that there should be consequences for women who seductively expose sensitive parts of their bodies and the law of the land should be amended to take care of this.
“Already, Section 26 of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act (2015) provides for indecent exposure ‘with intent to cause distress’ but it is hardly ever applied. This is the time for our lawmakers to take a second look at that aspect of the law with a view to strengthening it and effectively criminalising indecent dressing. Both the executive and the judiciary should also support the legislature for enforcement because any law without political will is a toothless bulldog.”
